Instrument selection and evaluation
1988
Instrument Selection and Evaluation in Analytical Chemistry
Sample size: 70000
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): F. L. Mitchell
Primary Institution: The Sycamores
Conclusion
The multi-centre evaluation approach for instruments in analytical chemistry has proven to be more efficient and reliable than single-centre evaluations.
Supporting Evidence
- Multi-centre evaluations provide comparable data on instrument reliability.
- Evaluations in different centres account for variations in instrument performance.
- Adopting guidelines can improve the quality of information provided by manufacturers.
Takeaway
Choosing the right lab instruments is tricky, but testing them in multiple places helps everyone know which ones work best.
Methodology
Instruments were evaluated in multiple laboratories to gather extensive data on their performance.
Potential Biases
Manufacturers may omit important information to make their instruments appear better.
Limitations
Few manufacturers have adopted the evaluation guidelines, limiting the availability of reliable information.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website