Genome-Wide Association Study of Relative Telomere Length
2011

Genome-Wide Association Study of Relative Telomere Length

Sample size: 6014 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jennifer Prescott, Peter Kraft, Daniel I. Chasman, Sharon A. Savage, Lisa Mirabello, Sonja I. Berndt, Joel L. Weissfeld, Jiali Han, Richard B. Hayes, Stephen J. Chanock, David J. Hunter, Immaculata De Vivo

Primary Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Hypothesis

We attempted to identify common genetic variants associated with log relative telomere length using genome-wide genotyping data.

Conclusion

The study did not identify genome-wide significant loci for telomere length, but replicated an association with the minor allele variant of rs16847897 at the TERC locus.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study replicated the inverse association of log relative telomere length with the minor allele variant [C] of rs16847897 at the TERC locus.
  • Common genetic variants associated with telomere length homeostasis have been difficult to detect.
  • The study had >80% power to detect β estimates as small as ±0.10 for SNPs with minor allele frequencies of ≥0.15.

Takeaway

The study looked for genes that affect how long our telomeres are, which are important for cell health, but didn't find strong evidence for new genes that do this.

Methodology

A two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted using data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to population stratification were addressed by adjusting for principal components of genetic variation.

Limitations

The study was underpowered to detect genome-wide significant associations for SNPs with small effect sizes.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 3,554 individuals from the Nurses' Health Study and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.003

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019635

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication