Disruption Scores and Citation Counts in Research
Author Information
Author(s): Li Mingtang, Livan Giacomo, Righi Simone
Primary Institution: University College London
Hypothesis
Are disruptive papers highly cited, and are highly cited papers disruptive?
Conclusion
The study finds that highly disruptive papers tend to receive more citations, but highly cited papers are not necessarily disruptive.
Supporting Evidence
- Highly disruptive papers tend to receive a higher number of citations than average.
- Most cited papers do not tend to be particularly disruptive.
- The correlation between disruption and citations varies across different percentiles of papers.
Takeaway
This study looks at how disruptive research papers are recognized by citations, finding that the most disruptive papers get more citations, but the most cited papers aren't always disruptive.
Methodology
The study analyzes disruption scores and citation counts from two large datasets of publications in Computer Science and Physics, using correlation analysis.
Potential Biases
Potential biases in disruption scores due to varying citation behaviors over time.
Limitations
The study cannot publicly share the Web of Science data due to contractual obligations.
Participant Demographics
The analysis includes researchers from Computer Science and Physics with active publication records.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website