Pseudo-endocrine Disorders: Recognition, Management, and Action
2024

Understanding Pseudo-Endocrine Disorders

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Michael T. McDermott

Primary Institution: University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine

Hypothesis

Pseudo-endocrine disorders are commonly diagnosed and treated despite lacking scientific evidence.

Conclusion

Many pseudo-endocrine disorders are based on misinformation and can lead to harmful treatments.

Supporting Evidence

  • Adrenal fatigue, Wilson's syndrome, and reverse T3 syndrome are examples of pseudo-endocrine disorders.
  • Many treatments for these disorders are not based on scientific evidence and can be harmful.
  • The Endocrine Society and Mayo Clinic do not recognize adrenal fatigue as a valid diagnosis.

Takeaway

Some people think they have diseases that don't really exist because of wrong information, and this can lead to taking dangerous treatments.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from reliance on anecdotal evidence and non-evidence-based practices.

Limitations

The article primarily reviews existing literature and personal observations without presenting new research data.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1210/jendso/bvae226

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication