Guiding Heart Device Placement with MRI Improves Outcomes
Author Information
Author(s): Francisco Leyva, Paul W. X. Foley, Shajil Chalil, Karim Ratib, Russell E. A. Smith, Frits Prinzen, Angelo Auricchio
Primary Institution: Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, UK
Hypothesis
Does using late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) to guide left ventricular lead deployment improve long-term outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)?
Conclusion
Using LGE-CMR to guide LV lead placement away from scarred myocardium leads to better clinical outcomes after CRT.
Supporting Evidence
- Patients with leads placed over scarred myocardium had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death.
- Using LGE-CMR improved the clinical outcomes compared to conventional lead placement methods.
- Patients with a scar burden of <10% had better outcomes than those with a higher scar burden.
Takeaway
Doctors used special MRI scans to help place heart devices better, which made patients feel better and live longer. If the device is placed near damaged heart tissue, it can cause more problems.
Methodology
559 patients with heart failure underwent CRT, with lead placements guided by LGE-CMR or not, and outcomes were assessed over a maximum follow-up of 9.1 years.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the observational nature and lack of randomization.
Limitations
This is an observational study, and the groups were not matched for baseline variables, which may affect the results.
Participant Demographics
Mean age 70.4 years, 78% men, with 66.7% having ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.0001
Confidence Interval
HR: 6.34 (3.64 to 11.0)
Statistical Significance
p<0.0001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website