The ethics of N of 1 trials in routine practice and other problems of publication ethics
2008
The Ethics of N of 1 Trials
Editorial
Author Information
Author(s): Richard Smith
Primary Institution: Cases Journal
Conclusion
The editorial discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the publication of N of 1 trials without patient consent.
Supporting Evidence
- The editorial discusses the ethical implications of publishing patient stories without consent.
- It raises concerns about the risks associated with the trials conducted on the babies.
- The author reflects on the historical context of ethics in primary care research.
Takeaway
This article talks about a story where two families tested if their babies had milk allergies, but it raises questions about whether they should have asked for permission to share that story.
Potential Biases
There is a risk of bias due to the lack of consent and potential ethical issues in conducting the trials.
Limitations
The editorial highlights missing data and the lack of consent from patients and ethics committees.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website