Clinical and economic benefit of HPV-load testing in follow-up and management of women postcone biopsy for CIN2–3
2003

HPV Load Testing for Women After Cone Biopsy

Sample size: 139 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Almog B, Gamzu R, Bornstein J, Levin I, Fainaru O, Niv J, Lessing J B, Bar-Am A

Primary Institution: Cervical Pathology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Hypothesis

Adding assessment of the HPV load of high-risk types as a triaging tool would enable the reduction of the number of colposcopic and reconisation procedures for the detection of one case of residual CIN2–3.

Conclusion

The HPV load approach reduces the number of unnecessary colposcopies and reconisations while maintaining the same detection rate of CIN2–3.

Supporting Evidence

  • HPV load testing can identify high-grade lesions effectively.
  • The HPV approach resulted in significantly fewer colposcopies and reconisations.
  • The cost per detected case of CIN2–3 was lower with the HPV approach.
  • HPV load testing had a positive predictive value of 100% for CIN2–3.
  • Conventional cytology had a higher rate of false positives compared to HPV testing.

Takeaway

This study found that checking for HPV levels can help doctors avoid extra tests for women who have had cervical surgery, making it easier and less stressful for them.

Methodology

A prospective cohort study comparing two follow-up approaches for women post-cone biopsy for CIN2–3: conventional cytology vs HPV load assessment.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in patient selection and follow-up adherence.

Limitations

The study was limited to a specific cohort and may not be generalizable to all populations.

Participant Demographics

Mean age was 38.8 years for Group 1 and 37.4 years for Group 2, with similar characteristics in contraception use, education level, and marital status.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6601032

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication