Comparing Surgical Techniques for Enlarged Prostate
Author Information
Author(s): S. Morsy, M. Elfeky, S. Abdel-Rahman, H. Torad, A. Rammah, M. Safwat
Primary Institution: Cairo University Hospitals
Hypothesis
This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of thulium laser and bipolar plasma enucleation for prostate sizes exceeding 80 grams.
Conclusion
ThuLEP shows better perioperative parameters compared to BPEP, but there are no notable differences in functional results and complications between the two techniques.
Supporting Evidence
- Both techniques were assessed for their effectiveness and safety in patients with enlarged prostates.
- The mean enucleation time was significantly higher in the BPEP group compared to the ThuLEP group.
- Postoperative outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.
Takeaway
Doctors compared two ways to remove a big prostate, and while one method was quicker, both worked about the same in the end.
Methodology
Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either BPEP or ThuLEP, and various perioperative and postoperative parameters were measured.
Potential Biases
The study lacks an analysis of costs and quality-of-life scores.
Limitations
The study has a relatively small sample size and short-term follow-up.
Participant Demographics
Patients with LUTS due to BPH and a prostate size of ≥80 g, with a mean age of 67.72 for BPEP and 62.33 for ThuLEP.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p=0.037 & <0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website