Developing Environmental Health Indicators for Climate Change and Health
Author Information
Author(s): Tammy Hambling, Philip Weinstein, David Slaney
Primary Institution: Institute of Environmental Science & Research Limited
Hypothesis
What is the most suitable framework for developing environmental health indicators (EHIs) to measure and monitor the impacts of climate change on human health?
Conclusion
The Driving force-Pressure-State-Exposure-Effect-Action (DPSEEA) framework is identified as the most suitable for developing EHIs to assess and monitor human health vulnerability related to climate change.
Supporting Evidence
- Environmental health indicators (EHIs) are essential for assessing and monitoring human health vulnerability to climate change.
- The DPSEEA framework provides a systematic approach to link environmental factors and health outcomes.
- Frameworks must accommodate the complexity of interactions between climate change and health.
Takeaway
This study looks at how we can create tools to measure how climate change affects our health, and it finds that one specific method is the best for this job.
Methodology
The study reviewed the attributes of 11 frameworks for developing environmental health indicators.
Limitations
The complexity of environmental health issues makes it difficult for any framework to fully represent the interactions involved.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website