Effectiveness of FACT in Dutch Mental Health Care
Author Information
Author(s): Marjan Drukker, Myrte Maarschalkerweerd, Maarten Bak, Ger Driessen, Joost à Campo, Arthur de Bie, Giovanni Poddighe, Jim van Os, Philippe Delespaul
Primary Institution: Maastricht University
Hypothesis
Patients receiving FACT have a higher probability of being in symptomatic remission over a period of time than patients receiving standard treatment.
Conclusion
Compared to standard care, FACT was more effective for patients with an unmet need for care regarding psychotic symptoms.
Supporting Evidence
- FACT patients with an unmet need for psychotic symptoms were more likely to be in remission than non-FACT patients.
- The odds of remission were significantly higher for FACT patients when controlling for other factors.
- The study suggests that continuity of care in FACT may contribute to its effectiveness.
Takeaway
This study found that a special treatment called FACT helps some patients with serious mental illness get better, especially if they really need help with their symptoms.
Methodology
Patients receiving FACT were compared with patients receiving standard treatment, matched on symptom severity and age, using propensity score matching.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to non-blinded interviewers who were involved in the treatment of the subjects.
Limitations
The study's observational design may limit the generalizability of the results.
Participant Demographics
Patients included were those with severe mental illness (SMI) living independently or in various care settings.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.002
Confidence Interval
1.97 – 22.7
Statistical Significance
p = 0.002
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website