Laparoscopy Versus Open Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024

Laparoscopy vs Open Surgery for Hernia Repair in Kids

Sample size: 662 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Almeida Diogo S, Medina Luís Henrique A, Miranda Nathalia C, Almeida Tiago S, Mattos Letícia F, Marchi Maria E, Azaro Marina M, Gousseaud Gabriel Q, Coelho Elaine R

Primary Institution: Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health

Hypothesis

This study aims to compare operative time, recurrence, and complications between laparoscopic and open techniques for the repair of inguinal hernia in children.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia repair in children is faster, with similar recurrence and complication rates compared to the open technique.

Supporting Evidence

  • Laparoscopic surgery had a significantly shorter operative time compared to open surgery.
  • Recurrence rates were similar between laparoscopic and open techniques.
  • Complication rates were also similar between the two surgical methods.

Takeaway

Doctors compared two ways to fix hernias in kids: one way is faster, but both ways have the same chance of problems later.

Methodology

This systematic review included four randomized clinical trials comparing laparoscopic and open techniques for inguinal hernia repair in children.

Potential Biases

Some studies had a high risk of bias due to unclear reporting.

Limitations

Limited number of available articles and significant heterogeneity among studies.

Participant Demographics

Pediatric patients aged from newborn to adolescent.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P < 0.00001

Confidence Interval

95% CI (-1.43, -0.07)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.74992

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication