Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science
2008
Two Views of Medical Science
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Jan P. Vandenbroucke
Primary Institution: Leiden University Medical Centre
Hypothesis
How do the two views of medical science differ in their approach to research and evaluation?
Conclusion
The essay argues that the two views of medical science, one focused on discovery and the other on evaluation, lead to different hierarchies of research designs.
Supporting Evidence
- The essay discusses how the two views lead to different hierarchies of research designs.
- It highlights the importance of both discovery and evaluation in medical research.
- The author reflects on their own contributions to understanding disease interactions.
Takeaway
There are two main ways to look at medical science: one is about discovering new things, and the other is about checking if treatments really work. Both are important!
Methodology
The essay analyzes the differences between two views of medical science and their implications for research design.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website