What's the problem? A response to 'secular humanism and scientific psychiatry'
2006
Response to Secular Humanism and Scientific Psychiatry
Commentary
Author Information
Author(s): Derek Bolton
Primary Institution: Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London
Hypothesis
Are secular humanism and scientific psychiatry compatible?
Conclusion
The commentary argues that secular humanism and scientific psychiatry are fundamentally incompatible due to their differing views on individual responsibility and coercion.
Supporting Evidence
- Secular humanism emphasizes individual freedom and responsibility.
- Psychiatry often operates through coercion rather than consent.
- The commentary highlights the neglect of practical issues in mental health treatment.
Takeaway
This piece discusses how secular humanism, which values freedom, conflicts with psychiatry, which often uses coercion in treatment.
Limitations
The commentary does not address practical problems faced by individuals seeking mental health treatment.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website