Parents' champions vs. vested interests: Who do parents believe about MMR? A qualitative study
2007

Parents' Trust in MMR Information Sources

Sample size: 72 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Shona Hilton, Mark Petticrew, Kate Hunt

Primary Institution: MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

Hypothesis

What do parents believe about the safety of the MMR vaccine and who do they trust for information?

Conclusion

Parents struggle to find trustworthy sources of information about MMR, often favoring other parents over health professionals and politicians.

Supporting Evidence

  • Parents found it difficult to know who to trust for balanced and accurate information about MMR.
  • Many parents viewed politicians as untrustworthy regarding health matters.
  • Parents often considered the stories of other parents to be more credible than those from health professionals.
  • Health professionals' perceived financial incentives led to distrust among parents.
  • Andrew Wakefield was seen by some parents as a credible source of information.

Takeaway

Parents are confused about who to trust when it comes to the MMR vaccine, often believing other parents more than doctors or politicians.

Methodology

Qualitative focus group study with 72 parents conducted in Central Scotland.

Potential Biases

Parents may perceive health professionals as biased due to financial incentives related to vaccination targets.

Limitations

The study may not represent all parents' views as it includes a higher proportion of vaccine skeptics.

Participant Demographics

64 mothers and 8 fathers, ages ranging from 15 to 53 years.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-7-42

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication