Crying Wolf: Wolves Should Not Be Considered Endangered
Author Information
Author(s): Mech L. David
Primary Institution: U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Hypothesis
Are the current populations of wolves in the upper Midwest truly representative of historical populations?
Conclusion
The current population of wolves in the upper Midwest meets legal criteria for delisting and is unlikely to be reduced by legal means.
Supporting Evidence
- The wolf population in the upper Midwest has increased significantly since being considered endangered.
- Current legal criteria for delisting have been achieved by the wolf population.
- The original causes of endangerment are no longer legal, making population reduction unlikely.
Takeaway
The study argues that the current wolf population is healthy and should not be put back on the endangered list, despite some genetic concerns.
Methodology
The commentary critiques a previous study's genetic analysis of wolf populations.
Potential Biases
The conclusions drawn may be influenced by the selection of samples and comparisons made.
Limitations
The previous study's sample may not be representative of the current wolf population.
Participant Demographics
Wolves from Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website