Survival After Lobectomy vs Limited Resection for Stage I Lung Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): H Nakamura, N Kawasaki, M Taguchi, K Kabasawa
Primary Institution: International University of Health and Welfare
Hypothesis
Is survival after limited resection comparable to that after lobectomy for stage I lung cancer?
Conclusion
Survival after limited resection for stage I lung cancer is comparable to that after lobectomy, but the differences are not statistically significant.
Supporting Evidence
- The meta-analysis included 14 studies with a total of 2790 patients.
- Survival differences at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.7%, 1.9%, and 3.6%, respectively.
- None of the survival differences were statistically significant.
Takeaway
Doctors wanted to see if taking out less lung for cancer surgery was just as good as taking out more. They found that both ways worked about the same for patients.
Methodology
A meta-analysis of 14 studies comparing survival rates after limited resection and lobectomy for stage I lung cancer.
Potential Biases
Publication bias was not detected, but the reliance on retrospective studies may introduce bias.
Limitations
The studies included were heterogeneous in design and patient characteristics, which may affect the results.
Participant Demographics
The studies included a mix of patients with stage I lung cancer, with varying histologic types and male/female ratios.
Statistical Information
P-Value
P=0.3659, P=0.5088, P=0.3603
Confidence Interval
95% CI, −0.8 to 2.1; 95% CI, −3.7 to 7.4; 95% CI, −0.4 to 10.5
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website