Clinical judgement and the medical profession
2011

The Role of Clinical Judgment in Medicine

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kienle Gunver S, Kiene Helmut

Primary Institution: Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology

Hypothesis

Can clinical judgment be effectively assessed and improved in medical practice?

Conclusion

The study discusses the importance of clinical judgment and suggests that a methodological advancement could enhance medical professionalism and patient care.

Supporting Evidence

  • Clinical judgment is essential for effective medical practice.
  • Recent interest in clinical judgment highlights its role in therapy assessment.
  • Gestalt cognition can enhance understanding of therapeutic causality.

Takeaway

Doctors use their judgment to decide how to treat patients, and this study says we need to get better at understanding and improving that judgment.

Methodology

Literature review and theory development.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the interpretation of clinical judgment due to reliance on anecdotal evidence.

Limitations

The study does not provide empirical data to support its claims.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01560.x

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication