Stroke in Brazil: prevalence, activity limitations, access to healthcare, and physiotherapeutic treatment
2024

Stroke in Brazil: Prevalence and Access to Rehabilitation

Sample size: 90846 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Luana Karoline Castro Silva, Christian Douglas Dantas de Sousa, Ramon Távora Viana, Renata Viana Brígido de Moura Jucá, Johnnatas Mikael Lopes, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Lidiane Andrea Oliveira Lima

Primary Institution: Universidade Federal do Ceará

Hypothesis

What is the prevalence of self-reported stroke and the accessibility of healthcare for stroke patients in Brazil?

Conclusion

The prevalence of self-reported stroke in Brazil was 1.9%, with many patients experiencing limitations in their activities and limited access to rehabilitation services.

Supporting Evidence

  • The national prevalence of self-reported stroke in Brazil was 1.9%.
  • 50.2% of stroke survivors reported limitations in their daily activities.
  • Only 24.6% of stroke patients reported having access to rehabilitation services.
  • 73.4% of individuals with activity limitations received no physiotherapeutic treatment.
  • 54.6% of stroke patients had regular follow-ups with healthcare professionals.

Takeaway

In Brazil, many people who have had a stroke struggle to get the help they need to recover, even though a lot of them see doctors regularly.

Methodology

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 National Health Survey, including participants aged 15 and older who reported a stroke diagnosis.

Potential Biases

Potential underreporting of stroke cases may affect the accuracy of the data.

Limitations

Self-reported measures may introduce subjectivity and memory bias.

Participant Demographics

Participants included individuals aged 15 and older from all five geographic regions of Brazil.

Statistical Information

P-Value

1.9%

Confidence Interval

95%CI 1.7–2.0

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1055/s-00054595

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication