A Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer Screening
2006

Review of Cancer Screening Preferences

Sample size: 8 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Phillips Kathryn A, Van Bebber Stephanie, Walsh Judith, Marshall Deborah, Lehana Thabane

Primary Institution: University of California, San Francisco; McMaster University

Hypothesis

What are the stated preferences for cancer screening among individuals?

Conclusion

There are very few studies on cancer screening preferences, and they primarily focus on a limited number of cancer types.

Supporting Evidence

  • Eight stated preference studies for cancer screening were identified.
  • Most studies focused on breast cancer and used contingent valuation methods.
  • Many individuals preferred not to undergo any screening at all.

Takeaway

This study looked at how people feel about cancer screenings and found that many don't want to be screened at all.

Methodology

Systematic review of stated preference studies for cancer screening using contingent valuation or conjoint analysis.

Limitations

The literature search may not have identified all relevant studies, and the included studies had varying methods and cancer types.

Participant Demographics

General population and patients, with specific studies including various sample sizes.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication