C-reactive protein, established risk factors and social inequalities in cardiovascular disease – the significance of absolute versus relative measures of disease
2008

C-reactive protein and social inequalities in cardiovascular disease

Sample size: 4268 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Maria Rosvall, Gunnar Engström, Göran Berglund, Bo Hedblad

Primary Institution: Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Hypothesis

The study examines the importance of established risk factors versus low-grade inflammation in explaining socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular disease incidence.

Conclusion

C-reactive protein and established risk factors contribute to socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular disease, with the scale of measurement affecting the conclusions drawn.

Supporting Evidence

  • Low socioeconomic position is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease.
  • Adjustment for risk factors only slightly reduced the socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular disease.
  • CRP levels above 3 mg/L are linked to increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Takeaway

People with lower education levels are more likely to have heart problems, and both inflammation and traditional risk factors play a role in this.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, focusing on socioeconomic position, established risk factors, and CRP levels in a cohort of Swedish men and women.

Potential Biases

There may be risks of bias due to misclassification of exposure and endpoints, as well as the exclusion of individuals with known cardiovascular disease.

Limitations

The study may be limited by potential biases in endpoint misclassification and the generalizability of findings due to the specific population studied.

Participant Demographics

The study included 4,268 Swedish men and women aged 46–68 years, with a higher proportion of women (2,501) than men (1,767).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.1–2.4

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-189

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication