Granisetron compared with prednisolone plus metopimazine as anti-emetic prophylaxis during multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
1999

Granisetron vs. Prednisolone Plus Metopimazine for Nausea During Chemotherapy

Sample size: 223 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Andersen L J, Havsteen H, Langer S W, Kjærbøl A-G, Lund H, Kjær M, Dombernowsky P

Primary Institution: Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Hypothesis

Is granisetron more effective than prednisolone plus metopimazine in preventing nausea during chemotherapy?

Conclusion

Granisetron was more effective than prednisolone plus metopimazine in preventing nausea during the first cycle of chemotherapy, but both treatments showed reduced efficacy over multiple cycles.

Supporting Evidence

  • Granisetron was superior to prednisolone plus metopimazine in preventing nausea during the first cycle of chemotherapy.
  • Prednisolone plus metopimazine was superior on days 2–5.
  • Overall, granisetron was superior on days 1–5.
  • The median number of cycles completed with granisetron was five compared to two for prednisolone plus metopimazine.
  • Constipation and rash were reported more frequently with granisetron.
  • Palpitations were reported more frequently with prednisolone plus metopimazine.

Takeaway

This study looked at two medicines to help stop nausea from chemotherapy. One medicine worked better at first, but both got less effective over time.

Methodology

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel study comparing granisetron with prednisolone plus metopimazine during nine cycles of chemotherapy.

Limitations

The anti-emetic efficacy of both treatments declined during multiple cycles.

Participant Demographics

Chemotherapy naive women with stage I or II breast cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P < 0.001

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval 4–6 for granisetron; 95% confidence interval 2–2 for prednisolone plus metopimazine.

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6690372

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication