Long term GP opinions and involvement after a consultation-liaison intervention for mental health problems
2008

GP Opinions on Mental Health Intervention

Sample size: 139 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Younès Nadia, Passerieux Christine, Hardy-Bayle Marie-Christine, Falissard Bruno, Gasquet Isabelle

Primary Institution: Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France

Hypothesis

What are the long-term opinions of GPs regarding a consultation-liaison intervention for mental health problems?

Conclusion

The intervention supported GP partners in their management of patients with common mental health problems.

Supporting Evidence

  • 91.2% of GPs evaluated effects as positive for primary care management.
  • 58.9% noted positive effects for patient medical outcome.
  • 79.7% of patients were managed by GPs post-intervention.

Takeaway

Doctors got help to take care of patients with mental health issues, and most felt it was helpful.

Methodology

A retrospective telephone survey was conducted with GPs two years after the intervention.

Potential Biases

Responses were based on personal interviews, which may reflect individual biases.

Limitations

The study relied on GPs' subjective opinions and was retrospective, which may introduce memory bias.

Participant Demographics

Patients were 77.5% female, mean age 39.7 years, with 60.6% having a current professional activity.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2296-9-41

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication