Understanding Clinical Practice Guideline Development in Spain
Author Information
Author(s): Calderón Carlos, Rotaeche Rafael, Etxebarria Arritxu, Marzo Mercé, Rico Rosa, Barandiaran Marta
Primary Institution: Osakidetza-Basque Health Service
Hypothesis
What are the perceptions and attitudes of experts regarding the GRADE method for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Spain?
Conclusion
The study highlights the need for better adaptation of Clinical Practice Guidelines to the complexities of clinical practice and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration.
Supporting Evidence
- Experts expressed concerns about the complexity and user-friendliness of the GRADE method.
- The study revealed a need for greater explicitness in the consensus process.
- Participants highlighted the influence of their professional backgrounds on their perceptions of the GRADE method.
Takeaway
Experts found the new guideline method hard to use at first, but it could help make better decisions in healthcare if improved.
Methodology
Qualitative research using non-participant observation and focus groups with 19 Clinical Practice Guideline experts.
Potential Biases
Participants' prior experiences and biases may have influenced their perceptions of the GRADE method.
Limitations
The study may not represent all expert opinions as not all potential participants were included.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 19 experts in Clinical Practice Guidelines from various health services in Spain.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website