User Experience and Extended Technology Acceptance Model in Commercial Health Care App Usage Among Patients With Cancer: Mixed Methods Study
2024

User Experience and Health App Usage Among Cancer Patients

Sample size: 264 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): de Azevedo Cardoso Taiane, Park Taezoon, Sure Tharun Anand Reddy, Zeng Chih-Wei, Girish V.G, Yu Zhiyuan, Park Ye-Eun, Tak Yae Won, Kim Inhye, Lee Hui Jeong, Lee Jung Bok, Lee Jong Won, Lee Yura

Primary Institution: Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine

Hypothesis

This study aims to investigate the app adherence and user experience of commercial health care apps among cancer survivors using an extended technology acceptance model (TAM).

Conclusion

The study highlights the importance of positive user experience and clinician recommendations in facilitating effective usage of digital health care tools among cancer survivors.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study categorized participants into short, medium, and long app usage groups based on their behavior.
  • Significant differences were found in perceived usefulness and interface satisfaction among the usage clusters.
  • Structural equation modeling indicated that perceived ease-of-use significantly influenced perceived usefulness.

Takeaway

This study shows that cancer patients are more likely to use health apps if they find them easy to use and if their doctors recommend them.

Methodology

The study enrolled 264 cancer survivors and collected survey results and app usage records to analyze user experience and adherence.

Potential Biases

The study may not account for non-compliance related to digital inequality.

Limitations

The study only included participants who could use a smartphone, which may limit generalizability.

Participant Demographics

Participants included cancer survivors with varying demographics, including age, gender, and education level.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P<.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/55176

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication