Inhaled delivery of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine does not result in enhanced pulmonary mucosal immunoglobulin responses
2008

Inhaled vs. Injected Pneumococcal Vaccine: Immunity Comparison

Sample size: 33 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gordon Stephen B., Malamba Rose, Mthunthama Neema, Jarman Elizabeth R., Jambo Kondwani, Jere Khuzwayo, Zijlstra Eduard E., Molyneux Malcolm E., Dennis John, French Neil

Primary Institution: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Hypothesis

Does inhaled 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine induce better pulmonary mucosal immunoglobulin responses than injected vaccine?

Conclusion

Injected pneumococcal vaccine significantly increases immunoglobulin levels, while inhaled vaccine does not produce a similar response.

Supporting Evidence

  • Injected vaccine produced significant increases in IgG and IgA levels in both serum and BAL.
  • Inhaled vaccine did not result in significant increases in immunoglobulin levels.
  • Participants receiving injected vaccine reported minor side effects, while inhaled vaccine also had side effects.
  • Bronchoalveolar lavage showed that injected vaccine increased mucosal levels of IgG.

Takeaway

This study found that getting a pneumococcal vaccine through an injection helps your body make more protective antibodies than if you breathe it in.

Methodology

The study compared immunoglobulin responses in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from adults receiving either injected or inhaled pneumococcal vaccine.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in participant selection as only HIV-negative volunteers were included.

Limitations

The study did not assess upper airway responses and only included healthy volunteers without a history of pneumonia or asthma.

Participant Demographics

33 adult volunteers, no history of pneumonia or asthma, normal chest X-ray.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.01, 0.001, 0.02

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.082

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication