Patients' Perspectives on n-of-1 Trials in the UK
Author Information
Author(s): Sara T Brookes, Lucy Biddle, Charlotte Paterson, Gillian Woolhead, Paul Dieppe
Primary Institution: University of Bristol
Hypothesis
Are n-of-1 trials acceptable to patients in the UK?
Conclusion
Patients perceive the n-of-1 trial as an acceptable approach to individualizing treatment.
Supporting Evidence
- Patients were eager to participate, believing it could lead to better symptom control.
- Daily diaries helped patients gain insight into their condition.
- Participants viewed the n-of-1 trial as a logical and fair method for treatment comparison.
Takeaway
This study shows that patients think n-of-1 trials are a good way to find the best treatment for them, and they are eager to participate.
Methodology
Patients with knee osteoarthritis participated in a 12-week n-of-1 trial comparing two knee supports or an NSAID with a simple analgesic, with interviews and daily diaries used to gather data.
Potential Biases
Potential for bias due to lack of blinding and patients' preconceived preferences.
Limitations
The pilot nature of the study and small sample size limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, aged between 31 and 67.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website