Post-Conflict Affiliation by Chimpanzees with Aggressors: Other-Oriented versus Selfish Political Strategy
2011

Chimpanzees' Post-Conflict Behavior: Affiliation with Aggressors

Sample size: 3003 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Teresa Romero, Miguel A. Castellanos, Frans B. M. de Waal

Primary Institution: Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University

Hypothesis

Does bystander affiliation toward aggressors reduce their aggressive tendencies?

Conclusion

Bystander affiliation toward aggressors reduces their aggressive tendencies and may serve as an alternative to reconciliation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Affiliation toward aggressors was more likely when previous opponents had failed to reconcile.
  • Male bystanders provided appeasement more often than females.
  • High-ranking male aggressors received more appeasement than female aggressors.

Takeaway

When chimpanzees see a fight, some of them go to the bully to be friendly, which helps calm the bully down and stop more fighting.

Methodology

The study analyzed 3,003 aggressive conflicts and post-conflict interactions among chimpanzees using Generalized Linear Mixed Models.

Limitations

The study did not address the social role of bystanders in detail.

Participant Demographics

The study involved two groups of chimpanzees, including multiple adult males and at least twice as many females, with individuals at least 10 years old.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0022173

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication