Unit-specific calibration of Actigraph accelerometers in a mechanical setup – Is it worth the effort?
2008

Calibration of Accelerometers for Better Data Quality

Sample size: 458 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Moeller Niels C, Korsholm Lars, Kristensen Peter L, Andersen Lars B, Wedderkopp Niels, Froberg Karsten

Primary Institution: University of Southern Denmark

Hypothesis

Does unit-specific calibration of accelerometers improve the accuracy of physical activity data collected in children and adolescents?

Conclusion

Unit-specific calibration factors did not significantly improve inter-instrument variability in field data for children and adolescents.

Supporting Evidence

  • Calibration reduced inter-instrument variability in a mechanical setup.
  • No significant change in variability was observed in field data after calibration.
  • High correlations were found between raw and calibrated data.

Takeaway

The study tested if adjusting accelerometers would make their measurements more accurate for kids' activities, but it didn't really help in real-life situations.

Methodology

Calibration factors were applied to 25 MTI and 53 CSA accelerometers in a mechanical setup and compared to data collected in free-living conditions.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to differences in how accelerometers were worn by participants.

Limitations

Calibration was performed in a controlled environment, which may not reflect real-world conditions.

Participant Demographics

458 children aged 8-10 and 444 adolescents aged 14-16, with a mix of boys and girls.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 206–239

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2288-8-19

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication