The Rise of Biosocial Super Age Estimates
Author Information
Author(s): Adam Perzynski, Douglas Gunzler, Jarrod Dalton, Kristen Berg
Primary Institution: MetroHealth and Case Western Reserve University
Hypothesis
What types of social changes might be postulated based upon a shift toward incorporating biosocial measures of aging in age-graded policy and care delivery?
Conclusion
Super Age estimates provide more predictive validity for disease and disability than chronological age.
Supporting Evidence
- Super Age estimates can indicate accelerated or decelerated aging.
- Neighborhood A adults experience hyper-aging of 4 to 7 years compared to their chronological age.
- Neighborhood B adults are as much as 3 to 5 years 'younger' than their chronological age.
Takeaway
Some neighborhoods age faster than others due to social and environmental factors, which can affect health outcomes.
Methodology
Molecular analyses were conducted to compare aging in two matched neighborhoods.
Limitations
The study does not address the long-term implications of using Super Age estimates in policy.
Participant Demographics
Adults aged 40 to 50 years from two neighborhoods.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website