Reforming Coercive Control Laws in Victoria
Author Information
Author(s): Balawyn Jones, Anyieth Akuch Kuol
Primary Institution: La Trobe University
Hypothesis
Should Victoria prioritize civil system reform over further criminalization of coercive control in domestic violence cases?
Conclusion
The study argues that further criminalization of coercive control may harm marginalized communities rather than protect them.
Supporting Evidence
- Women from CALD communities face unique barriers to accessing justice in domestic violence cases.
- Criminalizing coercive control may lead to overpolicing and misidentification of victims as perpetrators.
- Current civil law systems in Victoria already recognize coercive control, suggesting no need for new criminal laws.
Takeaway
The paper suggests that making new laws against coercive control might hurt some women more than help them, especially those from diverse backgrounds.
Potential Biases
The arguments may overlook the perspectives of some advocates who support criminalization.
Limitations
The study does not provide specific empirical data to support its claims.
Participant Demographics
The study focuses on women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website