Clinical importance of patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: results from U-BIOPRED
2024

Understanding Patient-Reported Outcomes in Severe Asthma

Sample size: 421 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Roy Meys, Franssen Frits M.E., Van ‘t Hul Alex J., Bakke Per S., Caruso Massimo, Dahlén Barbro, Fowler Stephen J., Geiser Thomas, Howarth Peter H., Horváth Ildikó, Krug Norbert, Behndig Annelie F., Singer Florian, Musial Jacek, Shaw Dominick E., Montuschi Paolo, Zee Anke H. Maitland-van der, Sterk Peter J., Roberts Graham, Kermani Nazanin Z., Incalzi Raffaele A., Louis Renaud, Andersson Lars I., Wagers Scott S., Dahlén Sven-Erik, Chung Kian Fan, Adcock Ian M., Spruit Martijn A.

Primary Institution: Ciro, Horn, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

Do asthma exacerbations affect changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over time, and can asthma-specific PROMs predict exacerbations in adults with severe asthma?

Conclusion

PROMs are significantly impaired in patients with severe asthma, and asthma exacerbations are key drivers of changes in these measures.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with no exacerbations showed significant improvement in PROMs.
  • Patients with more than two exacerbations experienced a deterioration in PROM scores.
  • Baseline ACQ5 was a predictor of exacerbations with low diagnostic accuracy.

Takeaway

This study shows that when asthma patients have flare-ups, their reported quality of life gets worse, but those without flare-ups feel better over time.

Methodology

Data from 421 patients with severe asthma were analyzed, focusing on various PROMs assessed at baseline and after 12–18 months.

Potential Biases

The PROMs used were not specifically developed for severe asthma, which may affect their accuracy.

Limitations

Data collection was limited to only two time points, which restricts the ability to identify fluctuations in symptoms.

Participant Demographics

62% female, mean age 51.9 years, 39% obese.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.590

Confidence Interval

95%CI 0.514–0.666

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/s12955-024-02321-3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication