Assessing Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Quality: A Retrospective Review of One Center's Findings
2024

Quality of Auditory Brainstem Response Testing in Children

Sample size: 80 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hannaan S. Choudhry, Roman Povolotskiy, Shahin Damji, Ying Yu‐Lan M., Nicole Raia

Primary Institution: Rutgers New Jersey Medical School

Hypothesis

Most outside ABRs do not meet the standards set by professional societies, leading to changes in diagnosis and treatment after repeat ABR.

Conclusion

Incomplete ABR testing may result in misdiagnosis and delays in treatment, highlighting the need for improved screening protocols.

Supporting Evidence

  • 80 patients met inclusion criteria for the study.
  • 37 repeated ABRs resulted in a change of diagnosis.
  • 23 cases had a change in ultimate management after repeat ABR.

Takeaway

This study shows that many children have incomplete hearing tests, which can lead to wrong diagnoses and delays in getting the help they need.

Methodology

Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent ABR testing from 2012 to 2019.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to geographic limitations and retrospective design.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and was limited to one geographic area, which may affect generalizability.

Participant Demographics

62.5% of patients were between 0 to 12 months old; 87.5% were full-term.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/oto2.70056

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication