A New Index for Journal Quality Based on Size and Citations
Author Information
Author(s): Barendse William
Primary Institution: CSIRO Livestock Industries
Hypothesis
Can a new strike rate index (SRI) provide a better measure of journal quality than the traditional impact factor?
Conclusion
The strike rate index explains more variation in citation counts than the impact factor, suggesting it may be a better measure of journal quality.
Supporting Evidence
- The strike rate index (SRI) shows a linear relationship with journal size and h-index.
- The SRI can be calculated for any arbitrary period, making it flexible.
- Journals with a high SRI tend to publish more highly cited articles.
- The SRI provides a more consistent measure of journal quality across different fields.
Takeaway
This study created a new way to measure how good a journal is by looking at how many times its articles are cited compared to its size.
Methodology
The study calculated the h-index and journal size for various journals and developed the strike rate index to compare journal quality across fields.
Potential Biases
The study may be biased towards journals with a higher volume of articles, potentially favoring larger journals.
Limitations
The study's thresholds for quality are empirical and based on a 20-year calculation period, which may not apply universally.
Participant Demographics
Journals from four fields: Agriculture, Condensed Matter Physics, Genetics and Heredity, and Mathematical Physics.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website