Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best
2011

Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel

Sample size: 4261 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Haring Robin, Feng You-Shan, Moock Jörn, Völzke Henry, Dörr Marcus, Nauck Matthias, Wallaschofski Henri, Kohlmann Thomas

Primary Institution: University of Greifswald

Hypothesis

Does self-perceived quality of life predict mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel?

Conclusion

A combined assessment of self-reported subjective health and measured biomarkers may be useful to identify high-risk individuals for intensified monitoring.

Supporting Evidence

  • Poor self-rated health was associated with a twofold higher mortality risk.
  • Low physical component scores were linked to increased mortality risk.
  • The combination of subjective health measures and biomarkers improved mortality risk prediction.

Takeaway

People who think their health is poor are more likely to die sooner, and combining this with blood tests can help find those who need more medical attention.

Methodology

Data from 4,261 individuals aged 20-79 years was analyzed using Cox proportional-hazards regression models to assess the association of subjective health with mortality.

Potential Biases

Potential non-response bias may affect the self-reported health measures.

Limitations

The study may have non-response bias and only included a healthy adult population with a low mortality rate.

Participant Demographics

Adults aged 20-79 years from a population-based cohort in Germany.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 1.34-3.20

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2288-11-103

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication