Physical Performance of Geriatric Women and Its Impact on Fracture Risk and Bone Mineral Density Assessed with Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS)
2024

Physical Performance and Fracture Risk in Older Women

Sample size: 182 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Elena Bischoff, Stanislava Popova-Belova, Fabian Bischoff, Nikola Kirilov

Primary Institution: Department of Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Trakia University, Bulgaria

Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate the impact of physical performance of geriatric women on their fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD).

Conclusion

The study revealed strong associations between physical performance and fracture risk, suggesting that rehabilitation programs focused on strength and mobility may be essential for fracture prevention.

Supporting Evidence

  • 78 women (43.6%) had osteoporosis of the spine.
  • Mean TUG and 5XSST times increased significantly with age.
  • HGS decreased with lower REMS-based BMD.
  • Faster 5XSST performance correlated with a lower FRAX for major osteoporotic fractures.
  • Subjects with TUG times under 10 seconds had a significantly lower fracture risk.

Takeaway

Older women who are stronger and can move better are less likely to break bones. Helping them stay strong and active can keep them safe.

Methodology

A prospective observational study assessed physical performance, BMD, and fracture risk in 182 geriatric women aged 60 and older using various physical tests and REMS technology.

Potential Biases

Self-reported data may introduce bias; limited diversity may affect generalizability.

Limitations

Potential biases in self-reported demographic data and limited participant diversity; absence of data on medication use and other pathologies.

Participant Demographics

Participants were geriatric women aged 60 years and older, with a mean age of 70 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.024 for TUG test, p = 0.012 for 5XSST

Confidence Interval

[8.95, 11.08] for TUG, [10.48, 11.93] for 5XSST

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/life14121579

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication