Measuring Social Capital in a Disadvantaged Community
Author Information
Author(s): Taylor Anne W, Williams Carmel, Dal Grande Eleonora, Herriot Michelle
Primary Institution: SA Department of Health
Hypothesis
How does the social capital profile of a disadvantaged area compare to the overall state data and what are its health implications?
Conclusion
Measuring social capital on a population level is complex and may not yield valuable results for policy decision making.
Supporting Evidence
- KBA respondents reported lower overall health status compared to the state average.
- Statistically significant differences were found in perceptions of neighborhood safety and trust.
- Older age and lower income were predictors of poorer health status in the disadvantaged area.
Takeaway
This study looked at how connected people are in a community and how that affects their health, finding it’s really complicated to measure.
Methodology
Data from three major population surveys were analyzed, including face-to-face and telephone interviews with randomly selected adults.
Potential Biases
The study may have biases due to the sampling methods and the reliance on self-reported data.
Limitations
Population surveys may not adequately measure social capital, and the use of different methodologies could affect results.
Participant Demographics
Participants were primarily from the Kilburn and Blair Athol suburbs, with a significant portion being older adults and low-income earners.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website