Education and training for laboratory automation
1988

Education and Training for Laboratory Automation

Editorial

Author Information

Author(s): Peter B. Stockwell

Conclusion

Laboratory automation is essential in chemical analysis and should be included in undergraduate teaching programs, but many professors are only teaching the basics.

Supporting Evidence

  • Laboratory automation has become commonplace but is not adequately taught in universities.
  • Many university professors are only teaching the bare essentials of automation philosophy.
  • Previous university groups focused on automation have not flourished due to various challenges.

Takeaway

Laboratory automation is important for chemistry students, but many teachers aren't teaching it well. We need better training for future scientists.

Limitations

The editorial discusses the lack of comprehensive training in laboratory automation and the decline of university groups focused on this area.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication