Philip Morris Scientists and the Chulabhorn Research Institute
Author Information
Author(s): Jeff Collin, Ross MacKenzie
Primary Institution: School of Public Health, University of Sydney
Hypothesis
Did Philip Morris consultants influence scientific research and training in Thailand?
Conclusion
Philip Morris consultants were able to influence research and teaching at a Thai research institute, raising concerns about the integrity of scientific research in public health.
Supporting Evidence
- Philip Morris consultants gained access to the Thai scientific community.
- Roger Walk, a PM scientist, influenced the study and teaching of environmental toxicology at the CRI.
- Documents indicate ongoing involvement by tobacco industry consultants at the CRI.
Takeaway
Philip Morris, a big tobacco company, got close to a Thai research institute to influence how they teach about smoking and health, which is not good for public health.
Methodology
Analysis of previously confidential tobacco industry documents made publicly available after litigation.
Potential Biases
The involvement of tobacco industry consultants in academic settings poses a risk of biased research outcomes.
Limitations
The study did not consult Thai individuals or organizations due to the sensitivity surrounding the royal family.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website