Improving Advanced Care Planning Discussions at an Internal Medicine Clinic
2024

Improving Advanced Care Planning Discussions at an Internal Medicine Clinic

Sample size: 52 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Brockman Michael J, Bies Jared J, Algheriani Hedaia, Aparece John P, Cazares Parson Marco, Del Toro Mijares Raul, Massebo Eyoab, Valles Ramon G, Zay Hein, Deoker Abhizith, Hechanova Lisa A, Edwards Brian P, Sarosiek Irene

Primary Institution: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso

Hypothesis

The project aimed to standardize advanced care planning (ACP) at an internal medicine clinic by initiating physician-patient communication regarding the patient’s knowledge, understanding, and openness to pursuing advanced medical directives.

Conclusion

This project revealed a notable gap in ACP documentation among patients at the internal medicine clinic, with very few patients having advanced directives prior to the intervention.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only 1.2% of patients reported having advanced directives before this study.
  • Post-intervention survey results showed a significant correlation between age and prior discussions about advanced directives.
  • Standardized educational resources effectively facilitated discussions, raising awareness and promoting engagement in ACP.

Takeaway

The study showed that many patients didn't have advance care plans, but after discussions, more patients were interested in making these plans.

Methodology

Data was collected through pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing patients' knowledge and discussions about advanced care planning.

Potential Biases

The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to response bias.

Limitations

The sample size was small and the study duration was short, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The average age of participants was 59 years, with common conditions including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.013; p = 0.025

Statistical Significance

p = 0.013; p = 0.025

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.75156

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication