Investment in online self-evaluation tests: A theoretical approach
2008

Cost-Effectiveness of Online Mental Health Screening After Disasters

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Francesco de Gara, William T. Gallo, Jonathan I. Bisson, Jerome Endrass, Stefan Vetter

Primary Institution: Centre for Disaster and Military Psychiatry, University of Zurich

Hypothesis

Can online self-evaluation tests for mental health improve cost-effectiveness in post-disaster scenarios?

Conclusion

Using online psychometric screening can help identify individuals at risk for PTSD, potentially reducing treatment costs and improving public health outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Early screening for psychological illness can reduce long-term treatment costs.
  • Investment in online screening tools can yield significant future cost savings.
  • Identifying individuals at risk for PTSD can help prevent economic burdens on public health systems.

Takeaway

This study shows that using online tests to check for mental health issues after disasters can save money and help people get better faster.

Methodology

The study uses a theoretical model based on cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of online screening tools for mental health.

Potential Biases

There is a risk that individuals who are not psychologically ill may still participate in the screening, leading to unnecessary costs.

Limitations

The model assumes 100% reliability of the screening tests and does not account for natural resolution of symptoms without intervention.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1752-2897-2-3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication