Documentation of in-hospital falls on incident reports: Qualitative investigation of an imperfect process
2008

Investigating In-Hospital Falls Reporting

Sample size: 212 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Terry P Haines, Petrea Cornwell, Jennifer Fleming, Paul Varghese, Len Gray

Primary Institution: Monash University

Hypothesis

What factors influence the recording of in-hospital falls on incident reports?

Conclusion

Improving staff understanding of incident reporting's purpose may enhance reporting practices for in-hospital falls.

Supporting Evidence

  • Staff reported feeling less likely to complete incident reports due to perceived blame.
  • A majority of staff believed that completing incident reports protects against legal liability.
  • Environmental factors like poor user-friendliness of reporting systems hindered reporting.
  • Staff time availability was a significant barrier to completing incident reports.

Takeaway

This study looked at why hospital staff sometimes don't report falls. It found that understanding the importance of reporting could help them do it more often.

Methodology

A qualitative multi-centre investigation using an open written response questionnaire.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to non-responses and the nature of the open-ended questions.

Limitations

The study may not have captured all contextual factors affecting reporting, and the written response format limited follow-up for clarification.

Participant Demographics

Hospital staff from various wards, including nursing and allied health professionals, with a mean experience of 11.8 years.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-254

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication