On the Power of Constructive Criticism
Author Information
Author(s): Anna Devor, Androu Abdalmalak, Taner Akkin, Yeka Aponte, George J. Augustine, Sabrina Brigadoi, Erin M. Buckley, Robert E. Campbell, Stefan A. Carp, Jean-Yves Chatton, Jerry L. Chen, Ji-Xin Cheng, Tomáš Cižmár, Robert J. Cooper, Ippeita Dan, Patrick J. Drew, Turgut Durduran, Valentina Emiliani, Tommaso Fellin, Amanda J. Foust, Ling Fu, Amir Gandjbakhche, Judit Gervain, Ariel Gilad, Edgar Guevara Codina, Xue Han, Elizabeth M. Hillman, Ute Hochgeschwender, Song Hu, Na Ji, Prakash Kara, Beop-Min Kim, Tiffany S. Ko, Duygu Kuzum, Jérôme Lecoq, Rickson C. Mesquita, Timothy H. Murphy, Valentin Nägerl, Nozomi Nishimura, Yumie Ono, Nisan Ozana, Francesco S. Pavone, Darcy S. Peterka, Ferruccio Pisanello, Anna Wang Roe, Andy Y. Shih, Shy Shoham, François St-Pierre, Sungho Tak, Lin Tian, Kai Wang, Martin Wolf, Ji Yi, Ofer Yizhar, Meryem A. Yucel
Conclusion
The editorial emphasizes the importance of constructive criticism in the peer review process for enhancing the quality of research submissions.
Takeaway
This editorial talks about how reviewers can help improve research papers by giving helpful feedback, and how being kind in criticism can lead to better science.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website