Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol
2008

Improving Shared Decision Making in Primary Care

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Légaré France, Stacey Dawn, Graham Ian D, Elwyn Glyn, Pluye Pierre, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Frosch Dominick, Harrison Margaret B, Kryworuchko Jennifer, Pouliot Sophie, Desroches Sophie

Primary Institution: Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec

Hypothesis

Can an interprofessional approach enhance shared decision making in primary healthcare?

Conclusion

The study aims to develop a conceptual model and measurement tools to improve shared decision making among healthcare professionals and patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • Shared decision-making is crucial for patient-centered care.
  • Existing models of shared decision-making often focus only on the patient-physician relationship.
  • An interprofessional approach can improve patient outcomes in primary care.

Takeaway

This study is about finding better ways for doctors and patients to make health decisions together by involving more healthcare workers.

Methodology

The study will create an inventory of existing models and tools, assess their strengths and weaknesses, and develop new tools through consensus among stakeholders.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the perspectives of the healthcare professionals involved in the study.

Limitations

The study may face challenges in achieving consensus among diverse healthcare professionals.

Participant Demographics

Participants will include healthcare professionals from various disciplines involved in primary care.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-2

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication