Development and Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Healthy Ketogenic Diet Versus Energy-Restricted Diet on Weight Loss in Adults with Obesity
2024

Healthy Ketogenic Diet vs Energy-Restricted Diet for Weight Loss

Sample size: 80 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Lim Su Lin, Tay Melissa, Ang Siew Min, Wai Shu Ning, Ong Kai Wen, Neo Wen Joo, Yap Qai Ven, Chan Yiong Huak, Khoo Chin Meng, Drenowatz Clemens, Greier Klaus

Primary Institution: National University Hospital, Singapore

Hypothesis

The study aimed to investigate the effect of a Healthy Ketogenic Diet (HKD) compared to an Energy-Restricted Diet (ERD) on weight loss and metabolic outcomes among adults with obesity.

Conclusion

The Healthy Ketogenic Diet was more effective than the Energy-Restricted Diet in promoting weight loss and improving cardiometabolic outcomes without increasing LDL-cholesterol levels.

Supporting Evidence

  • The HKD group achieved significantly greater mean weight loss at 6 months than the ERD group (−7.8 kg vs. −4.2 kg, p = 0.01).
  • The mean weight loss percentage at 6 months was 9.3% for the HKD group compared to 4.9% for the ERD group (p = 0.004).
  • Improvements in metabolic profiles were significantly better in the HKD group, including reductions in glycated hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure.

Takeaway

Eating a Healthy Ketogenic Diet can help people lose weight and improve their health without raising bad cholesterol levels.

Methodology

This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with 80 participants who were assigned to either the HKD or ERD for 6 months, focusing on weight change and metabolic outcomes.

Potential Biases

Self-reported dietary intake may introduce reporting bias and estimation errors.

Limitations

The study had a relatively small sample size and was conducted at a single center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

Multi-ethnic Asian adults aged 21 to 65 years with obesity (BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m2).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.6–131.9

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/nu16244380

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication