Diagnostic utility of BINAX NOW RSV – an evaluation of the diagnostic performance of BINAX NOW RSV in comparison with cell culture and direct immunofluorescence
2006

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of BINAX NOW RSV

Sample size: 100 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jonathan Nteimam

Primary Institution: Health Protection Agency, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

Hypothesis

Can BINAX NOW RSV provide reliable diagnostic results for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) compared to traditional methods?

Conclusion

BINAX NOW RSV can be relied upon for making infection control decisions in pediatric units during peak RSV activity.

Supporting Evidence

  • 11% of specimens were positive for RSV by cell culture.
  • 23% were positive by direct immunofluorescence.
  • 15% were positive by BINAX NOW RSV.
  • 19% were considered true positives.
  • 81% were true negatives.

Takeaway

The BINAX NOW RSV test helps doctors quickly find out if kids have a virus that makes them sick, especially in winter when many kids get sick.

Methodology

The study tested 100 specimens using BINAX NOW RSV, direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and cell culture to compare their effectiveness in diagnosing RSV.

Limitations

The sensitivity of BINAX NOW RSV was lower than expected, and negative results should be confirmed with another method.

Participant Demographics

The study included infants, children, and adults, with specific age ranges for each group.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1476-0711-5-13

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication