Quantitative Resistance of Potato to Pectobacterium atrosepticum and Phytophthora infestans: Integrating PAMP-Triggered Response and Pathogen Growth Induced Defense and Quantitative Potato Resistance
2011

Potato Resistance to Pathogens: A Study on PAMP-Triggered Response

Sample size: 5 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kröner Alexander, Hamelin Gaëlle, Andrivon Didier, Val Florence

Primary Institution: INRA (French National Institute for Agricultural Research), Agrocampus Ouest, Université de Rennes1, UMR 1099 BiO3P, Rennes, France

Hypothesis

Quantitative resistance to different pathogens is conditioned by quantitative differences in the kinetics or intensity of the same defense mechanisms induced by either the pathogen or by elicitors it produces.

Conclusion

The study shows that inducing a general defense mechanism does not necessarily result in quantitative resistance, suggesting a more complex model is needed to explain differences in resistance to various pathogens.

Supporting Evidence

  • PAL activity increased following treatment with the filtrate but not with lipopolysaccharides.
  • Chlorogenic acid inhibited growth of both pathogens in vitro.
  • Tuber slices with induced PAL activity showed increased resistance to P. atrosepticum.

Takeaway

This study looked at how potatoes fight off diseases caused by two different germs. It found that just boosting the plant's defenses doesn't always help it resist the germs.

Methodology

The study tested the PAMP-triggered model using two pathogens and five potato cultivars, measuring PAL activity and phenolic accumulation in tuber slices challenged with pathogen elicitors.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable to all potato cultivars or pathogens due to the specific conditions and cultivars tested.

Participant Demographics

Five potato cultivars with varying resistance levels to the pathogens were used.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0023331

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication