Comparative assessment of performance and genome dependence among phylogenetic profiling methods
2006

Evaluating Phylogenetic Profiling Methods for Eukaryotic Genomes

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Evan S. Snitkin, Adam M. Gustafson, Joseph Mellor, Jie Wu, Charles DeLisi

Primary Institution: Boston University

Hypothesis

Can phylogenetic profiling methods effectively predict functional linkages in eukaryotic genomes?

Conclusion

Phylogenetic profiling methods yield poor results for eukaryotic genomes, indicating the need for genome-specific approaches.

Supporting Evidence

  • Phylogenetic profiling methods were found to perform poorly when applied to eukaryotic genomes.
  • The inclusion of eukaryotic organisms in profiles primarily composed of prokaryotes reduced functional diversity.
  • Profiles consisting entirely of eukaryotic genomes yielded very limited accuracy and coverage.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well certain methods can predict gene functions in eukaryotes, and found that they don't work very well.

Methodology

The study compared various phylogenetic profiling methods using E. coli and S. cerevisiae as query organisms, assessing their performance in predicting functional linkages.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the evolutionary relationships among the organisms used in profile construction.

Limitations

The study's findings are limited by the current set of sequenced eukaryotic genomes, which may not provide sufficient diversity for effective profiling.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2105-7-420

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication