Assessing Falls Risk and Balance Systems Protocols in Adult Cancer Survivors
2024

Assessing Falls Risk and Balance in Adult Cancer Survivors

Sample size: 20 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Marrone-Lloyd Kenzi, Nielsen Kelli, Christopher Emma, Hinrichs Raegan, O’Donnell Caitlin, Gilchrist Laura

Primary Institution: St. Catherine University, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Hypothesis

Do balance assessment outcomes differ between adult cancer survivors and control groups, and are these outcomes associated with prior falls history?

Conclusion

Adult cancer survivors fall more often than non-cancer survivors and rely more on vision to maintain balance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cancer survivors fell more than their control counterparts.
  • Cancer survivors had a preference for vision in balance testing.

Takeaway

Cancer survivors are more likely to fall and depend on their eyesight to keep their balance.

Methodology

Twenty participants underwent sensory organization testing using computerized posturography and the MiniBest Test.

Participant Demographics

10 adult cancer survivors and 10 control participants.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.050

Statistical Significance

p=0.050

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/geroni/igae098.2250

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication