Research Agenda for Global Health Initiative
Author Information
Author(s): Peter J. Hotez
Primary Institution: George Washington University
Hypothesis
Allocating a small percentage of Global Health Initiative funds to neglected tropical diseases could significantly improve health outcomes.
Conclusion
Investing 1%–2% of GHI funds in neglected tropical diseases could lead to the development of new tools to combat these diseases and improve global health.
Supporting Evidence
- 1.4 billion people live below the World Bank poverty line and are affected by neglected tropical diseases.
- The US government has invested heavily in research for major diseases but neglects tropical diseases.
- Investing in neglected tropical diseases can help improve health and economic conditions for the poorest populations.
Takeaway
If the US spends a little bit of its health budget on research for diseases that mostly affect poor people, it could help create new medicines and vaccines to make them healthier.
Limitations
The current funding for neglected tropical diseases is minimal compared to the overall health budget.
Participant Demographics
Focus on the world's poorest populations living below the poverty line.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website