The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
Author Information
Author(s): Patricia Ann Kramer, Adam D. Sylvester
Primary Institution: University of Washington
Hypothesis
To establish the degree to which the various methods of calculating mechanical energy are correlated and to investigate the predictive methods' ability to explain variation in energy expenditure.
Conclusion
The choice of predictive method for locomotor energy expenditure depends on the specific questions being asked and the available data.
Supporting Evidence
- All methods of predicting energy expenditure were correlated with each other.
- The ACSM method explained more variation in energy expenditure than mechanical methods.
- Mechanical approaches can help explain why equations are not universally applicable across species.
- Subject-specific variables improved predictive ability for energy expenditure.
- Within subject variation was well-predicted, but between subject variation was less effective.
Takeaway
This study looked at how different methods predict the energy cost of walking, finding that all methods are related but vary in their accuracy for different individuals.
Methodology
Volumetric oxygen consumption and kinematic and kinetic data were collected on 8 adults while walking at different speeds, using statistical modeling to assess predictive abilities.
Potential Biases
Potential biases due to the small and specific sample of adults may not represent broader populations.
Limitations
The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
8 adults (4 men and 4 women) with varying ages and physical activity levels.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website